Why Parliament Cannot Build Without the People

Published on Feb. 23, 2026, 11:14 a.m. | Category: Dispute Resolution

Listen to this article:

Amid the ongoing tensions between Governors and the Senate, someone remarked almost in passing that such conflicts are not unusual. The National Assembly of Kenya and the Senate of Kenya have always clashed over laws requiring the concurrence of both Houses. The Constitution, they said, already provides a remedy: mediation. 

That remark sparked a deeper question. If mediation happens behind closed doors, what ensures that the final law still reflects what the public was invited to scrutinize? 

The Constitution anticipates these deadlocks. Under Article 110, both Houses must agree on Bills affecting counties. When they cannot, Article 112 establishes a Mediation Committee composed equally from both sides. From the moment the Committee holds its first meeting, the Constitution gives them exactly thirty days to agree. If they succeed, the mediated Bill returns to both Houses for approval. If they fail, the Bill lapses. 

But mediation does not place Parliament above the people. 

In disputes over the Finance Act 2023, though not a product of mediation, the High Court of Kenya and the Supreme Court of Kenya affirmed the “traceability” principle. Parliament cannot introduce entirely new provisions that were never subjected to public participation. However, amendments made directly in response to public input do not require a fresh round of participation. Only when changes fundamentally alter the character or scope of a Bill must Parliament return to the people. 

The lessons drawn from court are unmistakable. 

First, mediation exists to resolve disagreement between the National Assembly of Kenya and the Senate of Kenya, not to override public authority. It is a constitutional bridge between institutions, not a door closed to citizens. 

Second, your attendance and voice during public participation are not the end of your civic duty. They are the beginning of your oversight. Citizens, institutions, and businesses have the right to track Bills, scrutinise amendments, and ensure that what becomes law remains faithful to the Constitution and to the views submitted. Where that fidelity is broken, constitutional remedies remain available through the Judiciary of Kenya. 

This is where legal professionals play a critical role. We provide legislative tracking, legal analysis, and advisory services to help citizens, organisations, and stakeholders monitor Bills, understand amendments, and safeguard their interests throughout the law-making process. 

We invite you to partner with us or write to us for support in tracking legislation, reviewing amendments, and protecting your constitutional voice because democracy does not end when you speak. It endures when your voice is protected to the very end. 

 

Contibutor

Stella Orengo

 

CM Advocates LLP

Head Office – Nairobi 

I&M Bank House, 7th Floor, 2nd Ngong Avenue 

P.O. Box 22588 – 00505, Nairobi, Kenya 

T: +254 20 2210978 | +254 716 209673 

E: law@cmadvocates.com 

 

Mombasa Office 

Links Plaza, 4th Floor, Links Road, Nyali 

P.O. Box 90056 – 80100, Mombasa, Kenya 

T: +254 041 447 0758 | C: +254 791 649913 

E: mombasaoffice@cmadvocates.com 

 

Regional Offices 

Kampala | Dar es Salaam | Kigali | Lusaka | Juba | Addis Ababa

Disclaimer: This publication is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For tailored legal support, please consult our team. 

Get in Touch

Call 0716 209 673 or

Send us a Message



Share This Blog

Contact Us to Request a Consultation

×

Call us on +254 716 209 673

Or email us on

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
W

IF IT'S URGENT, PLEASE

CALL +254 716 209 673